Wildewood Skilled Nursing And Therapy

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered for one (#30) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. Regional Nurse Consultant #1 identified 15 residents who received insulin in the facility.
Findings:
A Specific Medication Administration Procedures policy, effective 01/22, read in part, .To administer medications via subcutaneous .routes in a safe, accurate, and effective manner .Check the order on the medication administration record to see that an injection is currently ordered and due .Document administration .
Resident #30 had diagnoses which included type two diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications and for type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease.
A Physician's order, dated 01/23/24, documented Humalog injection solution inject 5 units intramuscularly with meals related to type two diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications.
A Physician's order, dated 01/23/24, documented Humalog injection solution inject as per sliding scale intramuscularly before meals and at bedtime related to type two diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications.
A Physician's order, dated 05/16/24, documented insulin glargine subcutaneous solution 100 unit/ml inject 50 unit subcutaneously one time a day related to type two diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications.
A Physician's order, dated 07/16/24, documented Lantus Solostar subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit/ml inject 60 unit subcutaneously at bed time for type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease.
The August MAR documented the following blanks:
a. Humalog injection solution inject 5 units intramuscularly on the 3rd, 7th, 23rd, and the 26th at 1200 p.m.,
b. Humalog injection solution inject as per sliding scale intramuscularly on the 3rd and the 7th at 12:00 p.m., the 15th at 8:00 p.m., and the 30th at 8:00 p.m., and
c. Lantus Solostar subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit/ml inject 60 unit subcutaneously on the 30th at 8:00 p.m.
The September MAR documented the following blanks:
a. Humalog injection solution inject 5 units intramuscularly on the 5th at 8:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m.,
b. Humalog injection solution inject as per sliding scale intramuscularly on the 5th at 8:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., and on the 6th at 8:00 p.m., and
c. insulin galrgine subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit/ml inject 60 unit subcutaneously on the 5th for the 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. medication administration.
On 09/16/24 at 1:44 p.m., LPN #2 stated the policy for administering insulin to residents was to administer per physician's orders. LPN #2 reviewed the administration record for Resident #30. They stated the blanks on the insulin administration record meant it was not given.
On 09/16/24 at 1:55 p.m., the DON stated the policy for insulin administration depended on the physician's orders. They stated the blanks on the insulin administration record could be a variety of things. The DON was informed of the blanks on the August and September MAR and was provided opportunity to provide documentation for the blanks.
On 09/16/24 at 2:44 p.m., the DON provided documentation of resident being out of the facility on 09/15/24 during the 8:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. insulin administration times. They could not provide documentation for the above blanks.

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a home like environment for one (#30) of two residents reviewed for homelike environment.
The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.
Findings:
Resident #30 had diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia.
On 09/10/24 at 2:44 p.m., Resident #30's bed had an off white, dirty fitted sheet with a yellow spot and a torn pillow with no pillowcase.
On 09/11/24 at 9:37 a.m., multiple brown spots were observed on Resident #30's fitted sheet. The yellow spot was still on the Resident's fitted sheet. Resident #30 stated their linens needed to be changed.
On 09/11/24 at 10:16 a.m., CNA #1 stated they personally changed residents' linens every day. They stated the facility's process was Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.
On 09/11/24 at 10:17 a.m., CNA #1 stated if a resident had dirty linens, they would change them.
On 09/11/24 at 10:18 a.m., CNA #1 stated the use of torn pillows was not acceptable and they would replace them.
On 09/11/24 at 10:19 a.m., CNA #1 stated the last time they were in Resident #30's room was this morning.
On 09/11/24 at 10:21 a.m., CNA #1 made observation of the Resident's room. They stated the bed linens were dirty and needed to be changed. They stated the pillow needed to be replaced.
On 09/12/24 at 11:18 a.m., the DON stated linens were to be changed as needed and at residents' request.

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (#39) of one sampled resident reviewed for abuse.
The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.
Findings:
A Resident Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property policy, undated, read in part, .The resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse .Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enable through the use of technology .
Resident #39 had diagnosis which included vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, and anxiety.
Resident #39's quarterly assessment, dated 08/04/24, documented Resident #39 had severe cognitive impairment and required substantial assistance with ADLs.
An Initial State Reportable Incident form, dated 12/01/23, documented an allegation of Abuse/Mistreatment. It documented on 12/01/23 it was reported that there was a video with [Resident #39] and employee [name withheld]. Family doctor, police, and APS notified.
An Notification of Nurse Aide/Nontechnical Service Worker form, dated 12/01/23, documented the allegation had been reported on 12/01/23, and dietary aide #1 had been terminated.
A Follow up Information State Reportable Incident, form faxed to OSDH on 12/01/23 at 4:00 p.m., documented video was observed by the Administrator of employee [name withheld] displaying inappropriate content of language in the presence of [Resident #39]. No physical or sexual content was exhibited in the video. Employee was terminated immediately.
A Follow up and Final Information State Reportable Incident, form faxed to OSDH on 12/04/23, documented, Facebook video observed by Administrator, shows employee [name withheld], waving their hand in front of resident [name withheld] asking them where their paper is at and stating you are goofy, at some point in the video employee [name withheld] also made a statement of [explicit remark]. Employee [name withheld] proceeded to state they can do whatever they wants and can go mess with another [explicit language]. Part C. The facility completed an initial investigation by interviewing involved resident [name withheld], resident does not recall anything regarding the video, involved employee [name withheld] interviewed and admitted to the video and stated resident [name withheld] was the only resident included in the video. Facility interviewed [13] residents and [eight] staff members and by completing a focused assessment on the resident [name withheld], a head to toe assessment, an evaluation of his medication, medical and history incident and chart and record review. The resident [name withheld] was seen by [name withheld] health services for emotional support. Facility will continue to monitor resident for any changes in behavior and will follow up with [name withheld] services to re-evaluate for any changes. Focus assessments performed on [13] residents with no complaints or signs of abuse and completed compliance rounds. Dr. [name withheld] notified, family notified, police department notified [case # withheld], APS and nurse aide registry notified. Employee [name withheld] was terminated immediately. Upon completion the facility substantiated the allegation of abuse. The facility has educated the family and all staff members on the residents updated plan of care, residents' preferences/choices for ADL care, the signs and symptoms on abuse, neglect, and misappropriation, residents' right to respect and protect resident privacy, HIPPA violation, media photography, and threatening behavior, and on the policy and procedure for reporting allegations of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation.
The facility form titled Compliance Rounds documented compliance rounds were made on 12/01, 12/02, 12/03, 12/04, 12/05, 12/06, 12/07, 12/08, 12/09, and 12/10/23.
In-services, dated 12/01/23, documented in-services on media, photographs, threatening behavior, abuse, neglect, and misappropriation.
A suspension of a crime drill was held on 12/14/23.
On 09/13/24 at 2:23 p.m., the Administrator stated as soon as they had come in on the day of the incident, Resident #39's [family member] had made her aware of the incident.
On 09/13/24 at 2:24 p.m., the Administrator stated Resident #39's [family member] had shown them the video.
On 09/13/24 at 2:25 p.m., the Administrator stated they had interviewed Resident #39 and other residents' of the facility to make sure there weren't video's of them.
On 09/13/24 at 2:26 p.m., the Administrator stated they had interviewed residents, made sure Resident #39 was safe, asked facility therapist to see Resident #39, and a head to toe assessment with [name withheld] health services. They stated five day compliance rounds were completed and no residents or staff had any concerns.
On 09/13/24 at 2:30 p.m., the Administrator stated the facility did a PIP each month to review abuse allegations.
On 09/16/24 at 11:06 a.m., Resident #9 stated the facility would come ask every now and then if they felt safe in the facility.
On 09/16/24 at 1:11 p.m., Resident #52 stated they could not remember but that did not mean they did not talk with them.
On 09/16/24 at 2:11 p.m., CMA #2 stated we always talking about abuse and resident safety in our huddles. We monitor the residents for abuse. They stated that they did not witness the incident and they were sure the facility spoke with them because they talked with a lot of staff around that time.
On 09/16/24 at 2:13 p.m., CMA #3 stated yes, they spoke to me about the abuse. They stated they had not witnessed the incident. CMA #3 stated the facility often came and spoke with them about abuse and resident safety.
On 09/16/24 at 2:21 p.m., Resident #67 stated the facility did speak with them concerning abuse. I can't remember the specific time frame but they speak with us about safety and abuse.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed in a timely manner for one (#84) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans.
The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.
Findings:
Resident #84 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure and general anxiety disorder.
There was no baseline care plan located in Resident #84's EHR or hard chart.
On 09/12/24 at 12:40 p.m., MDS coordinator #1 stated the policy for initiating a baseline care plan was to access the baseline assessment on the EHR and it should be completed upon admission by the nurse admitting the resident.
On 09/12/24 at 12:44 p.m., MDS Coordinator #1 stated Resident #84 did not have a baseline care plan in their records.

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received restorative services to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one (#4) of one sampled resident reviewed for restorative services.
The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility. MDS Coordinator #1 identified 10 residents on restorative services.
Findings:
A Restorative Nursing policy, revised 07/06/09, read in part, .It is the policy of this facility to provide restorative nursing services to promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible. This concept actively focuses on maintaining optimal physical, mental and psychosocial function. Skill practice in such activities as walking and mobility, dressing and grooming, eating and swallowing, transferring, amputation care, and communication can maintain function in physical abilities and ADLs and prevent further impairment .Interventions will be assigned to designated nursing assistants and they will initial the daily record of treatment .and document actual minutes to provide each time the resident participates in the activity. A licensed nurse will evaluate the restorative care plan and revise as indicated and complete the monthly assessment .includes active or passive-should maintain function .Focus on maintaining the resident's self performance.
Resident #4 had diagnoses which included paraplegia and pain in left ankle and joints of left foot.
A quarterly assessment, dated 06/17/24, documented Resident #4 had impairment with both lower extremities.
A fall care plan, revised 11/19/19, documented PT, OT, and ST to screen, evaluate and treat prn. Restorative therapy as indicated.
An ADL care plan, initiated on 04/20/17, read in part, .Resident #4 requires assist with ADL's .Restorative as needed .
A Restorative Program/Nursing care plan Goals and Interventions form, dated 08/23/23, documented, long and short term goals: PROM to bilateral legs 3 sets of 15 repetitions 2 times a week times 4 weeks as tolerated.
Facility Task History documented the following:
a. Nursing Rehab: Active/Passive ROM to bilateral lower extremities, revision date 12/07/22,
b. Nursing Rehab: Active/Passive ROM to bilateral lower extremities, revision date 12/10/22,
c. Nursing Rehab: Passive ROM to bilateral lower extremities, revision date 08/23/23,
d. Nursing Rehab: Passive ROM to bilateral lower extremities 3 set of 15 repetitions two times a week times four weeks as tolerated, revision date 08/23/23, and
e. Nursing Rehab: Passive ROM to bilateral lower extremities 3 set of 15 repetitions two times a week times four weeks as tolerated, revision date 01/30/24.
On 09/11/24 at 11:30 a.m., Resident #4 stated they had asked for restorative service due to their legs being stiff. Resident #4 stated they were told they were on a list and restorative just hadn't gotten around to Resident #4. They stated they just wanted some range of motion with their legs and the facility had just gotten a restorative aide in the past three or four months. Resident #4 stated they were able to move their legs a little bit.
On 09/12/24 at 2:47 p.m., MDS Coordinator #1 provided a list of 10 residents who were currently receiving restorative services, Resident #4 was not on the list. They stated if the resident came off of therapy they would give her notification if the resident was determined appropriate for restorative therapy. They stated if a resident had a fall or a decline restorative interventions could get them back to where they were. They stated restorative therapy was done for 60 days and if no improvement services would be discontinued.
On 09/12/24 at 3:30 p.m., MDS Coordinator #1 stated the facility did not have a restorative aide for two and a half years. There was an aide who was working the floor a lot. They stated they now had a restorative aide for three or four months. MDS Coordinator #1 stated their was no documentation of restorative services being provided to Resident #4 for the 08/23/23 restorative plan of care.

Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered for one (#38) of two sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care.
The DON identified eight residents who received continuous oxygen therapy in the facility.
Findings:
Resident #38 had diagnoses which included COPD and heart failure.
A physician's order, dated 05/24/24, documented continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula related to COPD.
On 09/10/24 at 3:34 p.m., Resident #38 was observed receiving oxygen. They stated they were on continuous oxygen at 2 liters. The concentrator was set at 3 liters per minute.
On 09/10/24 at 3:46 p.m., LPN #1 reviewed Resident #38's orders. They stated the Resident was to receive 2 liters oxygen and there were no orders to increase as needed.
On 09/10/24 at 3:49 p.m., LPN #1 observed Resident #38's concentrator. They stated it was set at 3 liters per minute. They stated it was wrong and adjusted the concentrator to 2 liters per minute.
On 09/12/24 at 10:10 a.m., the DON stated oxygen should be administered as ordered.

Based on record reviewed and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dialysis resident had orders for monitoring for one (#78) of one sampled resident who were reviewed for dialysis.
The Administrator identified 80 residents who resided in the facility. The DON identified five residents who received dialysis.
Findings:
Resident #78 had diagnoses which included hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease without heart failure, with stage five chronic kidney disease, or end stage renal disease.
Resident #78's renal care plan, initiated 01/24/24, documented the following interventions;
a. check and change dressing daily at access site,
b. check AVF for thrill and bruit every shift. If absent notify the physician,
c. monitor AVF for S/S trauma and/or infection every shift, and
d. remove AVF dressing four hours after dialysis treatment one time a day every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.
There were no orders or documentation for monitoring the above.
On 09/16/24 at 1:25 p.m., LPN #2 stated dialysis residents were monitored by taking vital signs and checking the thrill and bruit upon return, and for bleeding. They stated they removed the dressing applied by the dialysis center four hours after the residents returned. They stated on non-dialysis days, the residents' labs, food and fluid intake were monitored.
On 09/16/24 at 1:27 p.m., LPN #2 stated the thrill and bruit, signs/symptoms of trauma and/or infection, dressing changes are documented in the TAR.
On 09/16/24 at 1:37 p.m., LPN #2 stated he must have gone out to the hospital, there are no orders.
On 09/16/24 at 1:45 p.m., the DON stated they did not see any orders for Resident #39's dialysis monitoring, but they had just put in the orders.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was informed about a fall intervention for one (#237) of two residents reviewed for falls.
The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.
Findings:
The Fall Program policy, revised 05/24, read in part, Educate resident's family .regarding these interventions and encourage family assistance and support.
Resident #237 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included history of falling, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side.
Resident #237's care plan for falls, revised 09/06/24, documented intervention for mattress on the floor.
On 09/11/24 at 10:37 a.m., Resident #237 was observed laying on a floor mattress. There were two mattresses laid side by side.
On 09/12/24 at 9:56 a.m., Resident #237 stated they did not like sleeping on the floor mattress. They stated staff told them it would stop them from falling. Resident #237 stated they fell because staff did not answer their call light in a timely manner.
On 09/12/24 at 11:02 a.m., a fall incident report, dated 09/06/24, was reviewed. It did not document Resident Representative #1 was notified about putting the resident's mattress on the floor as a fall intervention.
On 09/12/24 at 1:28 p.m., CMA #1 stated Resident #237's bed was taken away because they kept trying to get out of bed and they were a fall risk. They stated the Resident required two person assistance with transfers. They stated the bed was taken away about a week ago.
On 09/12/24 at 1:35 p.m., LPN #3 stated Resident #237 kept falling so they took away the Resident's bed.
On 09/12/24 at 1:39 p.m., the DON stated the mattress on the floor was implemented as a fall intervention on 09/06/24.
On 09/12/24 at 1:42 p.m., the DON stated Resident #237 had two other falls prior to the fall on 09/06/24. The DON stated they spoke with Resident's Representative #1 about the fall and they both agreed on placing the mattress on the floor as a fall intervention. They stated the in person conversation was not documented.
On 09/12/24 at 2:10 p.m., Resident Representative #1 stated they were not made aware of the Resident sleeping on a floor mattress. They stated they found out when they visited the Resident.
On 09/12/24 at 2:13 p.m., Resident Representative #1 stated the facility did not educate them on any implemented fall interventions for Resident #237.
On 09/12/24 at 2:36 p.m., the DON stated the facility did not have a system in place to determine what fall interventions to implement prior to taking away a resident's bed.
On 09/12/24 at 3:00 p.m., the Infection Preventionist provided an incident report dated 09/06/24. The incident report documented Resident Representative #1 was verbally spoken to. It documented Resident #237 and Resident Representative #1 agreed on putting the mattress on the floor as a fall intervention.
The above statement was not on the 09/06/24 incident report the surveyor reviewed prior to interviewing staff.
On 09/12/24 at 3:03 p.m., the Infection Preventionist and the DON were asked why the 09/06/24 incident report was no longer on the historical list. They stated the 09/06/24 incident report was still active. They stated the surveyor would not be able to access any active incidents.
On 09/12/24 at 3:04 p.m., the DON was asked how the surveyor was able to access the 09/06/24 incident report under the historical list. They stated they were not sure.
On 09/12/24 at 3:05 p.m., the DON was asked when the statement about Resident Representative #1 was added to the incident report. They stated they were not sure but if an incident is active, they can add information to it.

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide mail service to residents on Saturdays.
The Administrator identified 80 residents resided in the facility.
Findings:
On 09/12/24 at 2:52 p.m. during a Resident Council group meeting with 18 residents in attendance, they stated they were not aware of any mail being delivered on Saturdays.
On 09/13/24 at 2:00 p.m., the Social Services Director stated the BOM received the mail from the reception desk and sorts through it. They stated the residents personal mail went in to the Social Service Director's box. The Social Services Director stated they delivered personal mail to the residents.
On 09/13/24 at 2:01 p.m., the DON stated the mail was not delivered on the weekends.

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a NOMNC to one (#239) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification.
Regional Nurse Consultant #1 identified two residents who received skilled services in the facility.
Findings:
Resident #239 admitted to Part A skilled services on 02/12/24 and discharged from Part A services on 03/06/24. Resident #239 discharged home.
There was no documentation a NOMNC was provided to Resident #239.
On 09/12/24 at 1:39 p.m., the DON stated they could not locate a NOMNC for Resident #239.

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with a new diagnosis of mental illness was referred to OHCA for evaluation and determination of specialized services for two (#26 and #27) of three sampled residents reviewed for PASARR.
The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/01/23, documented 44 residents with psychiatric diagnoses.
Findings:
1. Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].
A Nurses Progress Note, dated 03/24/21, read in part, .focused charting r/t .PA .visited and evaluated resident .order to add diagnosis of schizophrenia d/t hallucinations and family report of diagnosis of schizophrenia .
There was no documentation OHCA was notified of the new diagnosis.
On 08/02/23 at 11:13 a.m., ADON #1 and BOM was asked to describe the process the facility complete when a resident had a newly evidence of serious mental disorder after the resident admited to the facility. ADON #1 stated they notified the BOM. The BOM stated they called OHCA and notified them.
On 08/02/23 at 11:15 a.m., ADON #1 and BOM were asked if Resident #27 had been diagnosed with a mental disorder. ADON #1 stated Yes, schizophrenia. They were asked when the resident had been diagnosed. The BOM stated, 03/24/21. They were asked if OHCA had been notified. The BOM stated they didn't remember calling them. The BOM looked at their notes and stated they didn't have documentation OHCA had been notified. They were asked if OHCA should have been notified. The BOM stated, Yes, we usually do.
2. Resident #26's admission record documented they were admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia.
A face sheet documented Resident #26's schizophrenia diagnosis was dated 12/21/22.
On 08/02/23 at 12:35 p.m., ADON #1 was asked when Resident #26 was admitted . ADON # stated Resident #26 was admitted on [DATE]. When asked if Resident #26 had a PASARR II completed, ADON #1 stated, No. Corp. Nurse Consult #1 and #2 stated a PASARR II was not needed because Resident #26 had a diagnosis of dementia.
On 08/02/23 at 1:20 p.m., Corp Nurse Consult. #1 was asked asked for the documentation of OHCA notification after Resident #26's schizophrenia diagnosis. No documentation was provided.

Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident used a smoking apron as ordered for one (#16) of one sampled resident reviewed for accident hazards.
The Corp Nurse Consult #1 identified 30 residents who smoked.
Findings:
Resident #16 had diagnoses which included aphasia following cerebral infarction and dementia.
A Annual Assessment, dated 12/04/22, documented the resident was severely impaired with daily decision making and currently used tobacco.
A Behavior Note, dated 05/01/23, read in part, .res observed smoking in room. cigarettes and lighter surrendered and placed on nurses cart .
A Behavior Note, dated 5/13/2023, read in part, .Res was noted by nurse .in [resident's] restroom smoking .Dr's on call was contacted and new order was given for res to have supervised smoking to prevent incidents .
A Physician's Order, dated 06/04/23, read in part, .Ensure resident has smoking apron on when [the resident] is outside to smoke every shift .
On 08/01/23 at 9:58 a.m., Resident #16's family member was asked if the resident could independently and safely smoke. They stated the resident had to be supervised.
On 08/01/23 at 1:05 p.m., Resident #16 was observed outside with a cigarette. Another resident lit the cigarette for Resident #16. Resident #16 was not observed wearing an apron. Staff were not observed outside with residents.
On 08/03/23 at 7:44 a.m., Resident #16 was observed with a unlit cigarette behind their ear wheeling towards the door to the outside smoking area.
On 08/03/23 at 7:46 a.m., another resident let Resident #16 outside and lit Resident #16's cigarette. Resident #16 was observed smoking without a smoking apron and no staff were observed outside with resident.
On 08/03/23 at 8:28 a.m., CNA #3 was asked how staff ensured residents safely smoked. They stated they make sure the residents can move their arms to their mouth. They stated some residents wore smoking aprons. They stated some residents were supervised and staff would monitor them. CNA #3 was asked who was supervised when they smoked. They stated Resident #16. CNA #3 was asked where residents smoked. They stated on the back patio. They stated a lot of the residents knew the code to go out. They stated if the resident couldn't go outside without assistance, the resident shouldn't be out there by themselves. CNA #3 was asked if Resident #16 was safe to smoke independently. They stated the residents looked out for each other. They stated they saw on the electronic health record Resident #16 was suppose to have a smoking apron. CNA #3 was asked who was responsible for ensuring interventions for smoking were followed. They stated the nurse or management.
On 08/03/23 from 9:22 a.m., to 9:30 a.m., Resident #16 was observed to wheel themselves in their wheelchair to their room and back to the door to the outside smoking area. Resident #16 was observed to have a unlit cigarette behind their ear at the door to the outside smoking area. CMA #5 was observed to open the door to the outside smoking area for Resident #16 to go outside. Another resident was observed to light Resident #16's cigarette. Resident #16 was observed smoking without an apron and no staff were observed outside.
On 08/03/23 at 9:34 a.m., LPN #3 was asked how staff ensure residents were safe to smoke independently. They stated when the residents went outside the staff kept an eye on them and some of the residents wore an apron. LPN #3 was asked what residents wore aprons. They stated Resident #16. LPN #3 was asked who ensured the residents wore the aprons. They stated the charge nurse or the staff who took the resident outside.
On 08/03/23 at 9:36 a.m., LPN #3 was asked to observe Resident #16 currently outside. LPN #3 went outside to observe Resident #16. LPN #3 was asked if staff were present. They stated, No. LPN #3 was asked if the resident was wearing an apron. They stated, No. LPN #3 stated they were going to see where was the resident's apron. They stated the aprons were usually kept in the resident's room.

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen, dishwashing area, and dry storage area was kept clean.
The Corp Nurse Consult #1 identified 76 residents received meals from the kitchen. They identified one resident who received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube.
Findings:
On 08/01/23 at 6:55 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made:
a. one dead fly and fly swatter were on the table with containers of cereal,
b. one dead roach was on the floor next to the table with cereal,
c. one semi dead bug was on the floor in front of the table with cereal,
d. food crumbs and debris were on the floor and along the wall under the table with the toaster,
e. multiple dead roaches and brown debris were on the floor scattered under the dishwasher and sink areas, and
f. mice feces, multiple dead roaches, chips, food wrappers, debris and crumbs were scattered under multiple shelves in the dry storage room and behind the door going into the dry storage room.
On 08/01/23 at 7:22 a.m., DA #1 was asked when staff swept and mopped the floor in the kitchen, dry storage area, and dishwashing area. They stated they do it if they work evening shift and were scheduled to work the next morning. They stated they didn't sweep or mop last night.
On 08/02/23 at 8:12 a.m., a follow up tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made:
a. mice feces, multiple dead roaches, chips, food wrappers, debris and crumbs were scattered under multiple shelves in the dry storage room and behind the door going into the dry storage room, and
b. one dead roach was on the floor under the shelf with pans, across from the stove in the kitchen.
On 08/02/23 at 8:20 a.m., the ACDM was asked to describe the cleaning schedule in the kitchen, dry storage room, and dish washing area. They stated they do have forms but they were revising them currently. They stated the aides and cooks each have a list and they sign off on them every day. They stated they ensured to clean up, and leave no crumbs or debris. They stated they swept every night.
On 08/02/23 at 8:25 a.m., the ACDM was asked for the cleaning sheets for this week they had signed off on. The ACDM was not able to locate them. The ACDM was asked if staff cleaned from 07/31/23 to 08/01/23. They stated when they arrived on 08/01/23, it didn't look like it.

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy by not investigating an allegation of misappropriation of property for one (#40) of one sampled resident reviewed for abuse.
The Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 06/28/2022, documented 59 residents resided in the facility.
Findings:
A Resident Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property policy, revised 12/28/17, read in parts, .misappropriation of property will not be tolerated .All employees of a nursing facility are mandated reporters of resident .misappropriation of property and must report any and all incidents .
Resident #40 had diagnoses which included quadriplegia.
A quarterly assessment, dated 11/23/21, documented the resident's cognition was intact and they required supervision with locomotion. It was documented the resident had impairment to both sides of their upper and lower extremities.
On 06/29/22 at 11:00 a.m., Resident #40 was asked if their $420.00 voucher was still missing. They stated it was. They were asked if they reported the missing voucher to anyone besides LPN #1. They stated, No, they don't care.
On 06/29/22 at 11:51 a.m., LPN #1 was asked if Resident #40 had reported missing a voucher on 12/04/21. They stated they had. They were asked if they reported it to administration. They stated had not. LPN #1 stated they looked for it, but couldn't find it.
On 06/29/22 at 12:26 p.m., the administrator was asked if they were aware Resident #40 had been missing a $420.00 voucher from 12/04/21. They stated they were not. They were informed at that time of the missing $420.00 voucher.
On 06/29/22 at 1:25 p.m., the administrator was asked if a resident reported missing property, such as $420. 00 voucher, should an investigation be conducted. They stated, Once I was notified. They were informed Resident #40 informed LPN #1 of the missing voucher. The administrator was asked if an investigation had been conducted. They stated there was not. They were asked what was staff instructed to do when informed of missing property. They stated staff were to follow their abuse policy which included neglect and misappropriation.

Based on record reviewand interview, the facility failed to administer medications per physician orders for two (#40 and #44) of seven sampled residents who were reviewed for medications.
The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 06/28/22, documented 59 residents resided in the facility.
Findings:
1. Resident #40 had diagnoses which included constipation.
A quarterly assessment, dated 11/23/21, documented the resident's cognition was intact.
A physician's order, dated 12/02/2021, documented dulcolax suppository (stool softener) insert 1 suppository rectally one time a day every Tuesday and Friday.
The January 2022 TAR documented the resident had not been administered their dulcolax suppository on 01/25/22. There was a blank where it was to be documented the medication was to have been administered.
On 06/29/22 at 1:15 p.m., LPN #1 was asked how they document a treatment had been provided on the TAR. They stated by clicking yes or no. They were asked a a blank indicated on the TAR. They stated either they did administer the treatment/medication or they did not chart on it.
2. Resident #44 had diagnoses which included pain, constipation, and COPD.
A physician's order, dated 07/06/21, documented to administer Spiriva Respimat Aerosol Solution 1.25 MCG/ACT (bronchodilator) 1 puff orally one time a day. The order was discontinued on 06/02/22.
A physician's order, dated 07/30/21, documented to administer Senna-S ( stool softener/laxative) 50mg/8.6mg by mouth two times a day.
A physician's order, dated 08/12/21, documented to administer gabapentin (anticonvulsant) 300mg three times a day.
The May 2022 TAR was reviewed. It was documented the administration of Spiriva Respimat Aerosol Solution on 05/31/22 was coded as a 9. The chart code documented to see the nurses notes.
An orders administration note, dated 05/31/22 at 3:45 p.m., documented Spiriva Respimat Aerosol Solution was on order.
The June 2022 MARs and TARs were reviewed. The following medication administration times were coded as 9's. The chart code documented to see the nurses notes.
a. 7a.m. - 11:00 a.m. dose of Spiriva Respimat Aerosol Solution on 06/01/22,
b. 6:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. dose of gabapentin on 06/06/22,
c. 3:00 p.m. doses of gabapentin on 06/07/22,
d. 6:00 p.m. -10:00 p.m. doses of gabapentin and Senna-S on 06/07/22,
e. 6:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. doses of gabapentin and Senna-S on 06/08/22
An orders administration note, dated 06/01/22, documented Spiriva Respimat Aerosol Solution was not available and the pharmacy was notified.
Orders' administration notes, dated 06/06/22, 06/07/22, and 06/08/22, documented gabapentin and Senna-S had been ordered and/or was in route.
On 06/29/22 at 12:44 p.m., the ADON was asked what determined when medications were to be ordered. They stated medications were to be ordered when they were low. They stated there should be a sticker on the medication card indicating for staff to order the medication. They were shown Resident #44's MARs, TARs and orders administation notes where the resident did not receive there medications.

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure:
a. food products were properly labeled/identified, and
b. food service equipment and the building was maintained clean and in good repair.
The Residents Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 06/28/22, documented 59 residents resided in the facility, and two residents received tube feeding. The ADON identified one of the two residents received nutrition and hydration solely through a feeding tube.
Findings:
On 06/28/22 at 8:40 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. There were two bulk containers of white dry ingredients stored next to the cook line that were not labeled.
On 06/29/22 at 7:58 a.m., a tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made:
a. there was an accumulation of black residue on the floor and the walls in the dish wash area,
b. there were multiple dead roaches on the floor in the dry storage area,
c. the lids on the two bulk containers of the white dry ingredients were cracked and in bad repair,
d. there was an accumulation of food and grease on the fryer, fryer basket, and the side of the stove,
e. the baseboard was loose and not secure to the wall behind the two compartment sink,
f. there was trash and an accumulation of black residue on the floor under and behind the ice machine,
g. there were holes in the walls behind the ice machine,
h. there was plastic peeling off of the top section of the ice machine, the area was not smooth and easy to clean,
i. there was an accumulation of black residue on the racks and the floor in the walk in cooler,
j. paint was missing off of the floor in the walk in freezer, the floor was rusted,
k. there was brown residue on the food storage racks in the walk in freezer, the racks were rusted,
l. the outside area of the walk in cold hold units were rusted,
m. there was an accumulation of grease and lint on the clean dish rack next to the two compartment sink,
n. paint/material was peeling off of the wall behind the food preparation table near the ice machine and the can opener table,
o. there were holes in the baseboards near the serve out window and the can opener table,
p. there was an accumulation of black residue on the dried glue adhesive on the floor near the hand sink, and
q. the white ceiling tiles throughout the kitchen were discolored with a yellow and red residue.
On 06/29/22 at 10:40 a.m. , the CDM was asked what was the policy for cleaning and maintaining food service equipment and the physical environment. They stated staff cleaned daily and they had a schedule for deep cleaning. They stated they reported issues to maintenance and contacted outside companies for repairs as needed. They were asked what was the policy for labeling food products. They stated once a box was opened they labeled and dated the product. They were asked about dry food products. They stated they just knew what the products were. They were informed of the above findings.